True News 4 U — BE Informed Report — 04/16/2020
TOPIC:Vaccine Crimes, Is Trump President in Name Only? and MORE...
Job 36:12 "But if they do not obey, they perish by the sword, and die without knowledge."
Proverbs 5:23 "He dies for lack of discipline, And in the greatness of his folly he goes astray."
Proverbs 10:21 "The lips of the righteous shepherd many, But fools die for lack of heart."
Hosea 4:6 "My people have perished for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge,..."
BE Informed is a new report that has just been developed to Inform, Warn and Educate people on things happening behind the scenes. We are to BE Informed; KNOW what is going on so that we may prepare ourselves for what is coming down the pipeline.
So, BE Informed and KNOW what is going on because we are living in a God Hating, Messiah Rejecting, Sin Cursed World.
It is BETTER to be DIVIDED by TRUTH than UNITED with ERROR.
There is so much going on these days that it is hard to keep one's nose above the flood of information being reported on the COVID-19 Pandemic, the economy, the government, FEMA, and so much more. Below, you will find various reports on these subjects. They are presented to Inform, Warn and Educate the read.
Is Trump Now President In Name Only Lets Find Out
The Seal Is Back Makes no Difference
I want to stated here that I have not been able to prove or disprove the info provided in the two videos above. I find it interesting and there may be some truth to what they are saying. However, personally, I would need more than what either one of these people are saying with some documentation to back up what they are saying. I am only trying to be objective. Personally, I am the kind of person who needs hard proof.
So, I have provided you with the two videos to watch and two articles below that talk about laws in place for a replacement person to be put into place should something happen to the President of the United States of America. I will leave it to you the reader to check the videos out and read the two articles to make up your own mind as to the validity of what is being presented in the above videos.
TheDisaster Relief Act of 1974(Public Law 93-288) was passed into law by the then President Richard Nixon as a United States federal law that established the process of presidential disaster declarations. The bill was introduced by Senator Quentin Burdick on February 26, 1974. The bill passed 91-0 as amended on April 10, 1974 and the House agreed to conference report by a vote of 392–0 on May 15, 1974.It was to better handle the array of disasters that occur annually throughout the 50 states. At one point, more than one hundred federal agencies were involved in handling disasters and emergencies. The Act also helped give more fixed relief to disaster survivors.
 "149 - Statement About the Disaster Relief Act of 1974". www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Retrieved November 27,2012.
 "40 Years Ago: The Disaster Relief Act of 1974". National Low Income Housing Coalition. Retrieved December 3,2017.
The “designated survivor” has long been one of Washington’s favorite parlor games—imagining what America would be like if a catastrophe befell the capital during a State of the Union and the most powerful office in the land were delivered unwittingly to the cabinet official who had been hidden away as the president-of-last-resort. What would America have looked like under President Jeh Johnson (2016)? President Ernest Moniz (2014)? Or even President Alberto Gonzales (2007)? And then there are the weirder examples: In 2001, had a catastrophe occurred during the inauguration, Americans expecting Republican President George W. Bush might have instead found themselves with a Democratic president named Larry Summers.
The idea is startling enough to fuel a new Kiefer Sutherland TV drama, Designated Survivor, in which the 24 actor plays a hapless Housing and Urban Development Secretary who finds himself ushered into the White House after a catastrophic attack on the Capitol.
You might assume that for something as important as presidential succession, the world's most powerful nation has it down to a science. That’s the scenario that Hollywood lays out in the show premiere tonight: Sutherland, who just minutes before had been headed to political obscurity in a low-profile ambassadorship, is instead ushered into the White House by an efficient set of government minders.
But in reality, the system is far less clearly delineated, and dogged by questions that are likely to begin the moment it’s pressed into action. I’ve spent the last three years researching a forthcoming book on the government’s doomsday plans, and one fact that emerged starkly is just how uncertain the whole process is. The system of presidential succession is relatively new, and in many cases it's surprisingly unclear who becomes president. As legal scholar Akhil Amar, who had long studied the legalities of succession, told Congress during one hearing after 9/11, “The current Presidential succession Act, 3 U.S.C. section 19, is in my view a disastrous statute, an accident waiting to happen. It should be repealed and replaced.”
Indeed, the presidential succession plan is the rare Washington story that’s even stranger—and contains even more unexpected twists—than the Hollywood version. For one thing, the system, known as “continuity of government,” is vastly larger and more complicated than most people realize. While attention usually focuses on the main presidential successor, during high-profile events a much broader shadow government often waits in secure undisclosed locations. During President Obama’s inauguration in 2009, when Defense Secretary Robert Gates was the designated presidential successor, James Clapper—then the undersecretary of defense for intelligence—waited out the swearing-in at the Pentagon’s secret Cold War bunker in Pennsylvania known as Raven Rock, ready to step into Gates’ role as defense secretary if the need arose.
But the even weirder thing is what might happen after a disaster. In fact, had Gates emerged from a cave to claim the presidency on January 20, 2009, it might’ve only marked the opening gambit in a legal drama that could have played out for days, weeks, or even months as a variety of officials from all three branches of government argued over who could rightfully claim the presidency.
For about three hours the designated survivor teeters on the edge of becoming the most important person in the world. That moment in the spotlight—or, more accurately, far from the spotlight—can be brief. The night in 1997 Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman served as the “designated survivor” during one of President Clinton’s addresses to Congress, Glickman went to New York for the night, with a security detail and the nation’s nuclear codes in tow, only to find that as soon as the speech was finished—and the need for a successor over—the security apparatus abandoned him, leaving him in the rain to catch his own taxi home.
The idea of a “designated survivor” was formalized by the Carter and Reagan administrations, as White House officials worried about nuclear missiles aboard Soviet submarines that lay off the Atlantic Coast and could have devastated the capital with barely 10 minutes’ notice.
President Carter’s White House Military Office in April 1980 had instituted new procedures with FEMA to monitor the attendance of all presidential successors “at major, publicly announced functions outside the White House complex.” While such gatherings of the U.S. leadership had been commonplace in the past—at inaugurations, states of the union, state funerals and the like—the rising tensions of the Cold War made government planners questions their wisdom. “The situation provides an inviting target to enemy attack or terrorist activity, and represents an unnecessary risk to national leadership,” the White House Military Office wrote, outlining the new procedures.
The 25th Amendment—itself a modern relic of the Cold War and fears of nuclear attack—lays out a seemingly clear line for presidential succession. It flows from the vice president to the House speaker to the Senate president pro tem, then through the cabinet in the order in which the departments were created—a quirk that itself makes the Department of Homeland Security secretary, one of the people best qualified to actually assume the presidency in a disaster, actually last in line.
When all those in the line of succession were gathered in a high-profile setting, FEMA was to notify the White House and an aide would recommend to the president which qualified cabinet successors should skip the event. (Constitutionally, foreign-born cabinet secretaries, like current Interior Secretary Sally Jewell—a Brit!—don’t serve in the line of succession.) It falls to a little-known branch of FEMA, the Central Locator Service, to track the whereabouts of the successors daily, and once a month, after the fact, audit a single day to determine whether it had correctly known where each cabinet member was.
The new White House and FEMA procedures got their first test at Reagan’s inaugural. The incoming and outgoing administrations had agreed that Carter’s outgoing defense secretary, Harold Brown, would remain in office past the standard noon departure and ensure that there was a national leader in case something catastrophic happened at the ceremony. “Both sides agreed that something should be done,” a FEMA official explained later. Brown only resigned later on inauguration day once the Reagan team was firmly in control of government’s levers.
The “designated survivor” program would grow more formal in the years to come—the chosen Cabinet member would receive a Secret Service detail for the length of the event and a White House military aide would arrive for the evening with one of the emergency briefcases known as the “Football,” which contain instructions on how to access the nation’s nuclear weapons codes—in case the unthinkable happened and the designated survivor needed to be ready to launch an attack.
The “designated survivor” program, though, raised a new problem: How would the “designated survivor” prove he or she was actually now the president? The government lacked simple procedures for figuring out how to double-check that person’s identity after a decapitation event. Is the person at the other end of the phone really Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack (State of the Union 2012)?
“One of the things we discovered is that there was no authentication system,” Reagan’s first FEMA head Louis Giuffrida said in 1981. “If a successor got on the horn and said, ‘I’m the successor,’ and somebody said ‘Prove it,’ [no one could]. So we’re working on that, and FEMA will be the authenticating mechanism to say, ‘Yeah, this guy’s for real. The president’s gone and we don’t know where the vice president is…and this is the man.’”
In the years ahead, FEMA and the White House worked out an elaborate (and classified) system through which a successor would be able to confirm his or her identity, and in subsequent years the “designated survivors” became a common part of Washington lore, and often yielded amusing stories from those who served. Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala recounted the story of how she watched the 1996 State of the Union from the White House and ordered pizza. “I took my staff with me and I ordered pizza for them in the Roosevelt Room,” she said years later. “I went to the Oval Office and for one minute sat in the president's chair and then I got up respectfully and went to watch the speech with my staff.”
Yet, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, a bipartisan commission examining the nation’s succession planning found that odd—and troubling—quirks persisted that could lead to serious constitutional quandaries in just the sort of situation that Kiefer Sutherland’s character, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Tom Kirkman, experiences in the TV show.
As clear as the line of succession may appear on paper, legally it would likely prove a much messier proposition the further down the list you go and cabinet officials become involved. And it could get particularly tangled if the president or vice president is only “incapacitated,” rather than killed outright.
It’s not entirely clear, even, that the House speaker or the Senate president pro tem could legally serve as president. Republican Senator John Coryn raised the question during the debate in the early 2000s of what would happen if a speaker of the House or Senate president pro tem ascended to the presidency—and then was challenged by the secretary of state who argued that the legislators didn’t count as constitutional officers, making them ineligible to serve in the presidency. “Believe it or not, the secretary actually has a rather strong case, in my view,” Cornyn said. No less an authority than James Madison himself had argued that the congressional leaders were legislators, not constitutional officers, and thus ineligible to succeed to the presidency. As Cornyn said, “Who is the president? Whose orders should be followed by our armed forces, by our intelligence agencies and by domestic law enforcement bureaus? If law suits are filed, will courts accept jurisdiction? How long will they take to rule? How will they rule? And how will their rulings be respected?”
China, Taiwan, and South Korea have been using a surveillance strategy called “contact tracing” that uses cell phones to track the user’s health records and those of everyone they contact. If a a cell phone comes in close contact with someone who might have a virus, the user receives a text message with instructions to self-quarantine for 14 days. US whistleblower Edward Snowden says: “Do you truly believe that when the first wave, this second wave, the 16th wave of the coronavirus is a long-forgotten memory that these capabilities will not be kept?” He also says such emergencies never end, and authoritarian policies become normalized.
Apple and Google announced they were teaming up to develop compatible contact tracing apps, which they say will be offered on an “opt-in” basis. However, Bloomberg reported that the companies are planning eventually to build the feature into all updates. Ranking on these apps could be used to allow entry into grocery stores or larger businesses and events. Snowden says the apps will be used to automate decisions about who gets a job, a loan, who can go to school, who gets a home, and who does not get those things. -GEG
In addition to quarantines and lockdowns, some governments like those in China, Taiwan, and South Korea have been using a surveillance strategy called “contact tracing” to reduce the spread of the novel coronavirus.
While each country’s contact tracing program has slight variations, all of them are essentially cell phone apps that keep a running record of the user’s heath and the health records of all the people they come into contact with.
If a cell phone comes in close contact with someone who might have the virus, the user receives a text message informing them and then instructing them to self-quarantine for 14 days.
However, the quarantine is not necessarily voluntary, depending on where you live. In some countries, phones have been used as a sort of house arrest ankle-bracelet that will notify authorities if the person being monitored leaves the house for any reason.
At face value, it may appear that this could be a useful strategy in preventing the spread of disease, but privacy advocates and tech experts are concerned that this information could be misused and that the unprecedented surveillance capabilities could be kept and held by corrupt governments long after the pandemic is over.
Robert F. Kennedy provides a long list of vaccine crimes committed by Bill Gates that caused death, paralysis and many other serious injuries. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested, and WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. A study shows that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents.-GEG
Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology.
Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.
The most frightening [polio] epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines are all linked to vaccines.
In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain.
In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
South African newspapers complained, ‘We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.’
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.
During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”
In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO has refused to recall the lethal vaccine, which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated more than $21-million towards developing a vaccine technology that uses a tattoo-like mechanism which injects invisible nano particles under the skin that can be read by smartphones. This technology now is being tested in a vaccine for the virus that causes COVID-19. The goal is to enable “house-to-house” vaccine campaigns.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated more than $21 million towards developing a vaccine technology that uses a tattoo-like mechanism which injects invisible nanoparticles under the skin that is now being tested in a vaccine against the virus that causes COVID-19.
The microneedle technology is also being wed to injectable technology, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which embeds under the skin a vaccination record visible by near infrared light that can be read by smartphone technology.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the technologies with aims to enable “house-to-house” vaccine campaigns undertaken by people with “minimal training.”
Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh reported in their study published April 1 in EBiomedicine, a Lancet Journal, that their microneedle patch vaccine against the SARS CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 “prompted robust antibody production in the mice within two weeks.” [ICWA note for thought: robust antibody production has not been a problem with experimental vaccines in this virus family–the problem has been with “pathogenic priming” or “immune enhancement.” Exposure to some vaccines can have the opposite effect intended, causing the vaccinated person to be at high risk of serious disease when later exposed to the wild virus or a virus in the same family.)
The patches resemble a spiky piece of Velcro, with hundreds of tiny microneedles made of sugar. The needles prick just into the skin and quickly dissolve, releasing the vaccine into the tiny abrasions and inducing a potent immune cell response despite the minute amount of the vaccine material – far more potent than an intramuscular injection. [ICWA note for thought: is a potent immune cell response always a good thing? The natural process of wild infection-exposure leads to a complex immune response that is usually in balance and controlled and self-limiting. What happens when through an unnatural entry point–injection with a standard needle or micro needles–a potent “foreign” immune response is triggered?]
The researchers had been testing vaccines using the microneedle patch for other coronaviruses, including the one that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and reported that three different experimental MERS vaccines induced the production of antibodies against the virus. These responses were stronger than the responses generated by regular injection of one of the vaccines along with a powerful immune stimulant (an adjuvant). Antibody levels continued to increase over time in mice vaccinated by microneedle patch—up to 55 weeks, when the experiments ended. The researchers have now turned their technology to the COVID-19 virus, SARS CoV-2. [ICWA note for thought: What is the long term effect of unnaturally increasing antibody levels for more than a year? Have there been any studies?]
“Testing in patients would typically require at least a year and probably longer,” senior co-author of the study, dermatology professor Louis Falo said. “This particular situation is different from anything we’ve ever seen, so we don’t know how long the clinical development process will take. Recently announced revisions to the normal processes suggest we may be able to advance this faster.” [ICWA note for thought: Testing in patients for even a year is not nearly long enough to learn the side effects, risks, and unintended consequences of artificially provoking the immune system with a new product. This has been a major complaint against the vaccine industry and FDA regulations for licensing. Speeding up testing requirements which are already far too fast cannot lead to any useful safety data. An immune reaction that takes weeks, months, or a few years to be recognized (if ever since we lack a robust surveillance system and vaccine-injury denial is heavily marketed) and in populations not chosen for clinical trials, cannot be forced to the surface by any timeline. Rushed vaccine development turns the entire population into laboratory animals, and the current marketing of fear intended to coerce people into compliance violates the Nuremberg Code, the UN Declaration of Human Rights, and many Federal Regulation Codes pertaining to Clinical Trials.]
Another study funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and published in December, 2019 by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Institute of Chemistry of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing and the Global Good, Intellectual Ventures Laboratory in Bellevue, WA, describes how “near-infrared quantum dots” can be implanted under the skin along with a vaccine to encode information for “decentralized data storage and bio-sensing.”
Bill Gates' Vaccine Crime Record
Indian doctors blame Gates for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates' vaccine regimen and evicted Gates. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.
By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
"Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft's ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy--the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.
Gates' obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.
Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India 's National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates' vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.
In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates' Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates' vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates' vaccines.
In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country's Supreme Court.
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK's experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.
During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, "We are guinea pigs for drug makers." Nelson Mandela's former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates' philanthropic practices as "ruthless" and immoral".
In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines "could reduce population".
In 2014, Kenya's Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony "tetanus" vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO's popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.
Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually. Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of - hijacking WHO's agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish - that good health only comes in a syringe.
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical -industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates' power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.
In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children."
Suspicious activity: Bill Gates reveals a plan to issue “Certificates” for COVID patients
by: Sara Middleton, staff writer|April 16, 2020
(NaturalHealth365) The COVID-19 pandemic has commanded its fair share of the media recently. As of Monday April 15, the world has reportedly seen over 2 million confirmed cases of the viral disease, with over 127,000 of these cases resulting in deaths. But as Big Pharma and health officials ramp up their efforts to end the spread of SARS-CoV-2, we’re seeing a new trending topic hit the headlines: coronavirus vaccine certificates.
Some people even suggest that the name “COVID” stands for “certificate of vaccination ID.”
Microsoft founder and former CEO Bill Gates – who after 34 years with the company surprisingly stepped away from the tech giant just one month ago – is now doubling down on his efforts to not only fund the development of a COVID-19 vaccine, but to garner support for a systematic method of tracking data of people who have (or have not) had either the disease or an immunization against it.
Bill Gates: People should have to PROVE they’ve recovered from or immunized against COVID-19
In an unprecedented, Orwellian step toward social control and data collection, the billionaire is publicly advocating for the use of technology that would keep track of who’s been immunized against SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19), or who’s had the infection and since recovered (and therefore has antibodies from their own immune system that protects them against the virus).
According to media watchdog PolitiFact, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has for years “funded research into invisible ink technology that could accompany vaccines to strengthen vaccination record-keeping.” This research began in 2016 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). PolitiFact goes on to admit that “Gates has said he supports the idea of a national tracking system to monitor the virus that causes COVID-19.”
“Eventually, what we’ll have to have is certificates of who’s a recovered person and who’s a vaccinated person,” Gates says bluntly in a recent interview with Chris Anderson of TED. He goes on to suggest that this information would be used to control where people go in their community and around the world, so as to protect countries that “won’t have [the novel coronavirus] under control.”
You can see the video in full from TED’s YouTube channel here:
How we must respond to the coronavirus pandemic | Bill Gates
Aside from obvious privacy and ethical concerns, there are valid issues over the accuracy of COVID-19 tests themselves. The key question: should we make these kinds of policing policies based on testing results which may or may not be correct?
To be fair, no diagnostic test is 100% accurate. But as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acknowledged in a March 15, 2020 fact sheet for healthcare providers, both false positive and false negative results for COVID-19 testing are possible, and even suspected in some cases.
What that means:
False positive = a person does not have COVID-19 but, their test results say they do.
False negative = a person does have COVID-19 but, their test results say they do not.
The main diagnostic test for COVID-19 (2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel), as well as the only test currently authorized by the FDA to detect antibodies against the novel coronavirus (also known as a serological test, which detects the body’s immune response to the virus rather than the virus itself) are both available under a statute known as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). That means these tests, by definition, have “not undergone the same type of review as an FDA-approved or cleared [test.]”
In other words: it’s yet to be determined how accurate these tests are. And just how much inaccuracy are we supposed to accept if we’re using the tests to determine whether people can or can’t travel, work, or move about in their community?
As for COVID-19 immunization – will it be mandated? If a person can’t “prove” they already had and recovered from the virus, will they be forced to get the vaccine? We don’t know the answers to these questions, but like many, we are deeply concerned about the potential precedences this pandemic may be setting.
Here are at least two ways novel coronavirus can be stopped that vaccine-pushers do NOT want the public to know about
Despite all these unknowns, world leaders seem to be working hard to normalize this idea of mass vaccinations and proof of immunization for all. Even Justin Trudeau, Canadian Prime Minister, warned that there will be no return to normalcy without a COVID-19 vaccine – which could take the better part of 18 months.
But are vaccines really our only saving grace?
To find our answer, we have to look beyond what mainstream media is willing to focus on. As we reported on last week, doctors in the United States and elsewhere are indeed finding significant success in treating patients with COVID-19 with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine (brand name Plaquenil). But what news outlets are overlooking is that hydroxychloroquine requires the trace mineral zinc in order to work!
As you may know, zinc is a powerful antiviral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immune-boosting element and has even been shown to block the replication of SARS-coronavirus in past studies.
Another promising treatment that doesn’t involve vaccinations is high-dose intravenous vitamin C therapy. This powerful anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agent has been used with great success in China and is also being used in U.S. hospitals for people fighting COVID-19 infections.
Newsweek and other outlets seem reluctant to suggest that vitamin C therapy will be useful for anything other than a stand-in treatment until COVID-19 vaccines are available. But we’re not so willing to write off these natural remedies yet…
…and given the alacrity with which people are welcoming Gates’ vaccine data tracking agenda, we don’t suggest you write them off, either.
Sources for this article include:
Last week, Minnesota State Senator Scott Jensen, MD, told Fox News that Medicare pays $13,000 to hospitals for COVID-19 admissions and $39,000 if they are placed on ventilators. In a followup interview with Jon Rappoport, Dr. Jensen says the money is a one-time lump-sum payment, and some hospitals have a pay-share plan with their staff doctors, which means there is strong incentive to call everything COVID-19. Since these single, are lump-sum payments, treating a patient with one 30-minute session produces as much revenue as treating the same patient twenty or more over many days. Therefore, it is incredibly profitable to diagnose those with very light symptoms as COVID-19, give them 30 minutes on a ventilator, send them home, hook up the next patient for 30 minutes, and so-on. [The word racket comes to mind, but that is too gentle. The criminality is much greater that. A New York ER doctor, Cameron Kyle-Sidell, says that, in some cases, ventilators actually cause injury and death because of the mechanical pressure they create on the lungs. See his comments in the first video below – and also check out the response from Dr, Jason Sonners in the second video. This is critically important information.] -GEG
A state senator has suddenly come out of nowhere and made big news.
My conversation with Minnesota State Senator, Dr. Scott Jensen, took place after I read the explosive statement he made to FOX News, on April 9th. So let’s start with his earlier FOX statement :
“Right now Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much. Nobody can tell me, after 35 years in the world of medicine, that sometimes those kinds of things [don’t] [have] impact on what we do…”
I reached out to Senator Jensen, and obtained clarification. Jensen told me his remark pertained to patients with Medicare coverage. And the 2 payouts he mentioned are standard insurance payments from Medicare which would go to the hospital.
Of course, he explained, some hospitals have a pay-share plan with their staff doctors. Therefore, a windfall for the hospital is passed along to those doctors.
Jensen told me: Take a Medicare patient who is diagnosed with simple non-COVID pneumonia. The hospital would receive a one-time Medicare lump-sum payout of $4600.
However, if that Medicare patient is diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia, the Medicare coverage is a one-time $13,000 payment. And if the hospital puts that COVID-19 pneumonia patient on a ventilator, the one-time payment is $39,000. NOTE: It doesn’t matter how long these patients stay in hospital—there is only going to be one lump-sum insurance payment.
So, I infer, there are several types of financial incentives for hospitals—
ONE: Diagnose as many people as possible with COVID-19.
TWO: Diagnose as many people as possible with COVID-19 who have light symptoms—making it easy to move them out of the hospital quickly.
THREE: Put as many COVID patients as possible on ventilators for as short a time as possible.
Under the heading of “diagnose as many patients as possible with COVID-19,” there is also the key question of what constitutes “a COVID-19 patient”—and how the use of that label can be multiplied and manipulated. Senator Jensen made a few choice comments to FOX on this subject as well.
From FOX News: “Dr. Scott Jensen, a Minnesota family physician who is also a Republican state senator, told ‘The Ingraham Angle’ Wednesday that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) guidelines for doctors to certify whether a patient has died of coronavirus are ‘ridiculous’ and could be misleading the public.”
NYC Doctor Goes Public: 'We May be Treating Wrong Disease'
On March 31, 2020, a doctor treating patients in New York City, uploaded a video. In the video, he goes public with a startling disclosure.The doctor reports patients that have been infected with COVID-19 require oxygen therapy not intubation.
Bill Gates Monopoly On World Philanthropy Has Put The Public’s Health At Risk
Dr. SHIVA LIVE: Interview w Hidden Truth and Fraud of the Mainstream Media
Dr. SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD Crushes Dr. Fauci Exposes Birx, Clintons, Bill Gates, And The W.H.O
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is assembling a task force of tech and artificial intelligence companies to develop text and data-mining techniques to spy on citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic
The task force of 60 companies, including Facebook, Google, Twitter, Uber, Apple, IBM, Microsoft and Amazon, will seek to predict COVID-19 outbreaks and the effectiveness of social distancing based on the communications between individuals
Geolocation tracking that monitors locations through phones and facial-recognition systems are under consideration
Facebook currently creates and shares "disease-prevention maps" derived from aggregated user data with government, researchers and nonprofits
During this COVID-19 pandemic, we are hearing stories about how some governments are abusing the privacy rights of their citizens in the interests of public health. The South Korean government is using smartphone location data, surveillance-camera footage and even credit card purchases to monitor those suspected of spreading COVID-19.1
Italian authorities are using mobile phones’ data to track people's everyday movements and whether they are obeying the government lockdown orders. Israel has deployed Shin Bet, its internal security agency designed to target terrorism, to use mobile phone location data to determine the whereabouts of citizens who may have been exposed to COVID-19.2
Such spying will also likely soon be the norm in the U.S. In March, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy began assembling a task force of tech and artificial intelligence companies to "develop new text and data-mining techniques that could help the science community answer high-priority scientific questions related to COVID-19," according to CNBC.3
An ‘All Hands on Deck’ Call to Big Tech
The 60 companies,4 which include well-known names like Facebook, Google, Twitter, Uber, Apple, IBM, Microsoft and Amazon,5 will try to deduce, through cellphone data, where the next wave of COVID-19 will occur6 and the effectiveness of social distancing.7 What mechanisms will they use? According to the Wall Street Journal, the technologies under consideration:8
"… include everything from geolocation tracking that can monitor the locations of people through their phones to facial-recognition systems that can analyze photos to determine who might have come into contact with individuals who later tested positive for the virus, according to people familiar with the matter."
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is not the only government agency enlisting the help of Big Tech companies during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to The Wall Street Journal:9
"Technology giant Palantir Inc., which was credited with helping to find Osama bin Laden, is helping the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention model the virus outbreak. Other companies that scrape public social-media data have contracts in place with the agency and the National Institutes of Health, documents show."
Facebook Already Provides User-Generated Maps
Facebook currently creates and shares "disease-prevention maps" derived from aggregated user data with the government, researchers and nonprofits. When people use Facebook apps on their phones with location services enabled, maps are generated,10 though the information is not shared with the general public.11 Facebook says the maps, generated by a project called Data for Good:12
"… are designed to help public health organizations close gaps in understanding where people live, how people are moving, and the state of their cellular connectivity, in order to improve the effectiveness of health campaigns and epidemic response.
These datasets, when combined with epidemiological information from health systems, assist nonprofits in reaching vulnerable communities more effectively and in better understanding the pathways of disease outbreaks that are spread by human-to-human contact."
Facebook-aggregated data allowed researchers to determine that weekday traffic into Seattle and its eastern suburbs dropped by half after the first Washington state COVID-19 outbreak and authorities' distancing requests, says Wired.13
The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Harvard's School of Public Health, National Tsing Hua University, Direct Relief and other schools and organizations have also used the maps in their COVID-19 prevention efforts.14
Sources and References
3, 4 CNBC March 19, 2020
5, 8, 9, 24, 28 Wall Street Journal March 17, 2020
7, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Wired March 18, 2020
10, 11, 14, 16 Business Insider March 18, 2020
If a future vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) contains any type of aborted human fetal tissue or associated derivatives, then Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, has indicated that he “will refuse” it no matter what. The Roman Catholic leader explained in a tweet that, even with the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), some people […]
Dear Clueless America: You Are Now Living Under The Tyranny You Deserve, For You Said Nothing When The Big Tech Censors Came For The Truth-Tellers Who Warned You This Would Happen
This article is not directed at our regular readers, but rather the oblivious, brainwashed masses who are now living under the tyranny they helped create. By failing to speak out against the coordinated, malicious censorship carried out by the communist-infiltrated tech giants, these people allowed our world to plunge into the very darkness and mass […]